A month ago I finished reading a novel I had not written. I had asked a system of AI agents — coordinated through a workflow I built — to produce a novel from three pieces of creative direction: use the Haitian Revolution as the setting, draw on Laurent Dubois's Avengers of the New World as a source, take Hamlet as an inspiration rather than a template. The system did the rest.
That reading changed what I thought was coming for the creative industry. The common knowledge was that long-form AI content generation was hampered by compounding errors, that current models could produce decent short passages but lost coherence over long arcs. It turns out the problem was not the model. It was the scaffolding. The right file support system, the right division of labor across specialized agents, the right prompt engineering — standard pretrained models can carry a novel.
I had no agency over whether tools like this would be deployed. I did have agency over how mine would be deployed — toward broad distribution or narrow capture, toward giving the capability to individual artists or concentrating it in the hands of whoever could pay the most for it.
I have chosen to open-source the system. Open-Write is the public release: the full production pipeline, the templates, the tools, the methodology. I am keeping a small set of proprietary additions for the version I use internally. Releasing those would lower the floor — anyone with minimal commitment and limited craft could produce work that passes superficial review, and the floor falling that far would hurt the industry more than it would help any individual user. Holding those additions back means the public release rewards the people putting real time and real judgment into using it. The foundation is given freely under Apache 2.0. The advantage stays with skill and commitment.
This will cost people jobs. I will not pretend otherwise. I have thought about it honestly and arrived at a position I can defend: the technology is coming whether I build my version or not; what I can do is make sure one version is in everyone's hands, not just in the hands of those who can pay for it.
If the show I have spent ten years developing is ever produced, a portion of its proceeds will go to charity organizations in four counties in Missouri — Jackson, Cass, Bates, and Vernon — the communities depopulated by General Order No. 11 in 1863. The descendants of pro-slavery Border Ruffians paid a generational price for their ancestors' choices, and the national culture has either forgotten them or written them off. The show takes the position that history's victims include people the audience has been taught to dislike. The charity arrangement makes that position structural rather than rhetorical. I commit to it in public, before any deal has been signed, so that the commitment cannot be quietly walked back later.
Open-Write is yours. You do not need my permission. You do not need to know me. The system is given to anyone willing to put the work in. What you make of it is up to you.
Read the full essay →